Our work at the Covid Inquiry

Clinically Vulnerable Families has been a Core Participant in the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, speaking for people at higher medical risk. This page is our record of that work: what we did, what we said, what the Inquiry found and what we say about it now. Our documents are kept here so they remain available after the Inquiry’s website closes.

Since
2023
Modules
7 of 10, Core Participant in 4
Evidence
Written & oral
Voices
Member evidence

Chronology

Our history at the Inquiry

We took part from early 2023, putting forward Clinically Vulnerable people’s experience through written and oral evidence, submissions and our own surveys. We were a Core Participant in Modules 3 (healthcare), 4 (vaccines and therapeutics), 8 (children and young people) and 10 (impact on society). Adam Wagner KC led our legal team in Modules 3, 4, 8 and 10.

  1. February 2023

    We set out our case for Module 3 (healthcare) in written submissions to the preliminary hearing.

  2. April 2024

    CVF’s legal team made oral submissions at the Module 3 preliminary hearing.

  3. May 2024

    Written submissions for Module 4 (vaccines and therapeutics).

  4. June 2024

    Two CVF members, Lesley Jean Moore and Dr Adrian Warnock, gave Module 3 witness statements about their care.

  5. August 2024

    Our written opening statement for Module 3.

  6. October 2024

    Dr Catherine Finnis (8th October) and Lesley Moore (30th October) gave oral evidence in Module 3.

  7. November 2024

    Adam Wagner KC delivered our oral closing submissions for Module 3 on 28th November.

  8. November 2024

    Lara Wong gave our Module 4 witness statement. We were granted Core Participant status for Module 10.

  9. December 2024

    Our opening statement for Module 4.

  10. January 2025

    Lara Wong gave our Module 4 oral evidence on 16th January and Adam Wagner KC delivered our closing submissions on 31st January. Read our account: how Clinically Vulnerable Families were left behind

  11. February 2025

    Written closing submissions for Module 4, and our submissions for the first Module 10 preliminary hearing.

  12. September 2025

    Opening submissions for Module 8 (children and young people). Why the children’s module matters.

  13. October 2025

    Lara Wong gave a Module 8 witness statement. We published our Report on Children & Young People and sent submissions to the second Module 10 preliminary hearing.

  14. October 2025

    Adam Wagner KC questioned Professor Russell Viner and Professor Catherine Noakes for CVF in the Module 8 hearings (22nd October).

  15. February 2026

    Module 10 hearings began. We published our Impact on Society Report alongside them. Lara Wong gave oral evidence on 24th February.

  16. March 2026

    Adam Wagner KC delivered our oral closing submissions for Module 10 on 5th March.

  17. 19th March 2026

    The Module 3 report was published. Our response: “We came masked. We changed minds”

  18. 16th April 2026

    The Module 4 report was published. Our response: “A success story, yes. But for whom?”

  19. 14th September 2026

    The Government responded to the Module 3 report. The Inquiry called for clean air in healthcare. Six months on, where is it?

Evidence & submissions

Evidence store

This is the archive: what we submitted, module by module. Opening and closing submissions set out what we asked the Inquiry to find. Written and oral evidence is the testimony of our team and our members. Where we hold a copy of a document, the link opens it from this site, so it stays available after the Inquiry’s website closes.

Module 3

Healthcare

Infection control, airborne transmission and DNACPR decisions

We argued that infection control in healthcare must reflect airborne transmission, and raised how DNACPR decisions affected Clinically Vulnerable patients.

Preliminary hearings

Opening submissions and statements

Written evidence

Oral evidence

Closing submissions

Module 4

Vaccines & therapeutics

Vaccines, antivirals and protection for Clinically Vulnerable people

We argued that Clinically Vulnerable people were left behind on vaccines, antivirals and protective treatments such as Evusheld, and that the benefits of the programme were not shared fairly.

Preliminary hearings

Opening submissions and statements

Written evidence

Oral evidence

Closing submissions

Expert evidence

Module 8

Children & young people

Schools, masking and the experience of children in Clinically Vulnerable households

We put forward the experience of children in Clinically Vulnerable households, including school absence, pressure to deregister and bullying for masking.

Preliminary hearings

Opening submissions and statements

Written evidence

Oral evidence

Module 10

Impact on society

The long-term, unequal impact on people at higher medical risk

We asked the Inquiry to examine the long-term, unequal impact on people at higher medical risk, and to hear properly from experts on clinical vulnerability.

Preliminary hearings

Opening submissions and statements

Written evidence

Oral evidence

Closing submissions

More documents are added as they are published or found.

External evidence

Expert evidence that matters to Clinically Vulnerable people

The evidence store is what CVF submitted. This is the independent evidence we relied on, or challenged, where the Inquiry’s experts missed the experience of people at higher medical risk.

Vaccines & monitoring

Professor Stephen Evans

Hurdles and nets – authorising and monitoring vaccines

Why it matters It sets out how vaccines were authorised and monitored, the context for our evidence on who was left behind.

Read the expert report (INQ000474707)

Schools, air & children

Air, schools and children

Prof Jim McManus, Prof Clive Beggs, Prof Sir Chris Whitty and research on children’s education and mental health

Why it matters These sources underpin our Module 8 opening.

Read our Module 8 opening

Clinical vulnerability itself

Who should be heard

Prof Christina Pagel, Dr Duncan Robertson and Prof Catherine Noakes

Why it matters In Module 10 we criticised the commissioned report on “disability and clinical vulnerability” and asked the Inquiry to hear these experts.

Read our submissions

Outcomes

What the Inquiry found – and where our evidence shows

How we read each report. The Inquiry’s findings and our response are labelled separately, so you can always tell whose words and whose view you are reading.

Module 3 report — Healthcare

19th March 2026

The Inquiry

Airborne transmission and clean air

The report calls for infection-prevention guidance to reflect all plausible routes of transmission (Recommendation 1) and for HEPA filtration and ventilation to be prioritised in healthcare buildings. This is the core of what we put to the Inquiry.

The Inquiry

Our members’ voices

Dr Adrian Warnock’s evidence is quoted in the report, and our members’ accounts of care, including DNACPR decisions, sit behind its findings.

CVF’s response

Not yet delivered

As we read it, the report makes no recommendation to review DNACPR decisions made during the pandemic, and none to recognise clinical vulnerability as a protected characteristic. We continue to press for both.

Module 4 report — Vaccines & therapeutics

16th April 2026

The Inquiry

Protection must be a priority

The report accepts that protecting the immunocompromised, including through preventive drugs such as Evusheld, must be a priority.

The Inquiry

Lara Wong’s evidence

The report quotes her on the freedoms others gained through vaccination, and the consequence of not protecting this group.

CVF’s response

The gap

The report treats the vaccine programme as a success. Our response asks who that success was for, because Clinically Vulnerable people were left out of its benefits.

Module 8

Children & young people

Report awaited

The Inquiry has not yet published its Module 8 report. When it does, we will set out here how it reflects the evidence of children in Clinically Vulnerable households, including the findings in our own report.

Module 10

Impact on society

Report awaited

Hearings took place in February and March 2026. We will add the Inquiry’s findings when the report is published.

Our interpretation

Our articles on the Inquiry

September 2026 · Latest

The Inquiry called for clean air in healthcare. Six months on, where is it?

Our look at what has happened since the Module 3 report called for clean air in healthcare.

Read the article

The bigger picture

The Inquiry is part of a bigger story

The Inquiry is one part of our work to make sure people at higher medical risk are heard, protected and able to participate fully in society.